Re: Union of Union with facets

• From: Xan Gregg <xan.gregg@jmp.com>
• Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 10:52:58 -0400
• To: "Zafar Abbas" <zafara@microsoft.com>
• Cc: <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
• Message-Id: <90E3F82D-21DE-11D9-807D-000A95B51846@jmp.com>

This is issue R-198 against XML Schema 1.0.  It was classified as a 
error to be fixed in 1.1.

xan

On Oct 18, 2004, at 3:11 PM, Zafar Abbas wrote:

> I have a question about the section in the Xml Schema structures spec
> about Union Schema Component (under 3.14.2). It mentions that the 
> actual
> value of member type definitions is formed by replacing a union type
> definition in the explicit members with members of their respective
> member type definitions.
>
> But it doesn't mention anything about the case where a restriction of a
> union (with some facets, e.g. enumeration) is a member type of another
> union. How should the facets be applied to the parent union while
> resolving the child union to its simple type definitions?

Received on Tuesday, 19 October 2004 14:53:30 UTC