- From: Zafar Abbas <zafara@microsoft.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 12:11:45 -0700
- To: <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
I have a question about the section in the Xml Schema structures spec about Union Schema Component (under 3.14.2). It mentions that the actual value of member type definitions is formed by replacing a union type definition in the explicit members with members of their respective member type definitions. But it doesn't mention anything about the case where a restriction of a union (with some facets, e.g. enumeration) is a member type of another union. How should the facets be applied to the parent union while resolving the child union to its simple type definitions? Thanks, Zafar Abbas
Received on Monday, 18 October 2004 19:12:18 UTC