- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 08:45:47 +0000
- To: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
- Cc: "'Bruno Chatel'" <bcha@chadocs.net>, "Michael Kay" <mhk@mhk.me.uk>, xmlschema-dev@w3.org
noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com writes:
> I >think< we've actually had some user requests for such extension of
> "all", but unless Michael Kay is making such a request now (I don't think
> he is), I can't immediately find the reference. I think it's a nice to
> have, but have no personal urgent need for such a new feature. In any
> case the fact that it would violate the invariant quoted above doesn't
> particularly bother me.
I think it should bother you, because it's fundamental for any versioning
strategy which expects V1 software to process V2 instances by
depending on the invariants, which I at least think is a very sensible
approach.
ht
--
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
Half-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
Received on Monday, 9 February 2004 03:46:02 UTC