- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 08:45:47 +0000
- To: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
- Cc: "'Bruno Chatel'" <bcha@chadocs.net>, "Michael Kay" <mhk@mhk.me.uk>, xmlschema-dev@w3.org
noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com writes: > I >think< we've actually had some user requests for such extension of > "all", but unless Michael Kay is making such a request now (I don't think > he is), I can't immediately find the reference. I think it's a nice to > have, but have no personal urgent need for such a new feature. In any > case the fact that it would violate the invariant quoted above doesn't > particularly bother me. I think it should bother you, because it's fundamental for any versioning strategy which expects V1 software to process V2 instances by depending on the invariants, which I at least think is a very sensible approach. ht -- Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh Half-time member of W3C Team 2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/ [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
Received on Monday, 9 February 2004 03:46:02 UTC