- From: <jozef.aerts@xml4pharma.com>
- Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 10:12:02 +0100
- To: <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
Dear all, I have the following simple base schema (Base.xsd): <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" elementFormDefault="qualified" attributeFormDefault="unqualified"> <!-- empty group --> <xs:group name="base"> <xs:sequence></xs:sequence> </xs:group> <!-- root element --> <xs:element name="rootelement"> <xs:complexType> <xs:sequence> <xs:element name="myelement" type="myelement-definition"></xs:element> </xs:sequence> </xs:complexType> </xs:element> <!-- another element --> <xs:complexType name="myelement-definition"> <xs:sequence> <xs:group ref="base" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/> </xs:sequence> </xs:complexType> </xs:schema> and its implementation (BaseImplementation.xsd): <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" elementFormDefault="qualified" attributeFormDefault="unqualified"> <!-- redefine the base schema --> <xs:redefine schemaLocation="Base.xsd"> <!-- add a new element to the empty base --> <xs:group name="base"> <xs:sequence> <xs:group ref="base"/> <xs:element name="testelement" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/> </xs:sequence> </xs:group> </xs:redefine> </xs:schema> Xerces(2-6-2) and Xerces-based tools like Exchanger XML Editor find this OK. XMLSpy (2005SP1) however complains: "Redefining model group definition 'base' must be a valid restriction of its redefined pendant. I asked the people of Altova (Spy) and received the answer that "According to the W3C Specifications......src-redefine.6.2.2 prescribes that the redefining model group must be a restriction of the redefined one" So my question: who is right ? Does Xerces not check well on src-redefine.6.2.2 or does Spy have another interpretation of the spec ? Many thanks in advance, Jozef Aerts XML4Pharma
Received on Friday, 10 December 2004 09:14:11 UTC