- From: Jeff Lowery <Jeff.Lowery@creo.com>
- Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 16:17:58 -0700
- To: "'Neil Bradley'" <Neil.Bradley@rubus.com>, xmlschema-dev@w3.org
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Neil Bradley [mailto:Neil.Bradley@rubus.com]
> This answer to my question below appears to rule-out the
> possibility that <unprefixed> could be defined as a local
> element child of the <fragment> element that is required to
> not include the prefix.
You can undeclare the default namespace to make <unprefixed> unqualified:
<doc xmlns="DOC_NAMESPACE">
<X:fragment xmlns:X="FRAGMENT_NAMESPACE" xmlns="">
<unprefixed>???</unprefixed>
</X:fragment>
</doc>
Received on Wednesday, 21 May 2003 19:20:11 UTC