- From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>
- Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 15:38:28 +0100
- To: "Roger L. Costello" <costello@mitre.org>
- CC: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
Hi Roger, > Now, here is an example of an instance of "num": > > <num>32</num> > > Question: is it correct that num's value (32) is always represented > as a "string", regardless of how num is declared? That is, are all > values just strings, with a "datatype label" associated with the > string? In XPath 2.0 and XQuery, implementations are free to store the value of a node as either the lexical form + a type annotation or the typed value. The important consequence of this is that if the <num> element is typed as a numeric type and you have: <num>0032</num> and then do: <xsl:value-of select="num/text()" /> then an implementation that stores the typed value will return "32" whereas an implementation that stores the lexical form + type annotation will return "0032". From the looks of it, I think it's likely that most XQuery implementations will store the typed value while most XSLT 2.0 implementations will store the lexical form + a type annotation. Cheers, Jeni --- Jeni Tennison http://www.jenitennison.com/
Received on Monday, 12 May 2003 10:38:36 UTC