- From: <ron@high-valley.com>
- Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 11:25:34 -0500
- To: Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>
- Cc: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
My apologies to those who read the message and found the well-formed errors. I had to change some things for the public forum because of confidentiality issues and non-disclosure, etc. The working example does not have those errors, and I was able to run it through XSV without complaint. I was also not aware of the proper use of the url's "www.example.org" and "www.example.com" instead of the ones that I used for schemalocation. I am thinking that this is an MSXML4.0 bug, but curiously I cannot find any other references to the problem. There has been no response to my question on the microsoft forum. One possibility is that I am validating the document during the load of the xml instead of using a schemacache. At least I know there is nothing wrong with the schema now. Thanks - Ron Thompson Quoting Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>: > Hi Ron, > > > Using MSXML4 SP1, I am unable to validate a document that XMLSpy 5 > > can validate just fine. I have narrowed it down to the use of > > xs:include. If my schema includes another schema a validation error > > is returned that says: > > > > "The element 'RealTimeSIRequest' is used but not declared in the > DTD/Schema" > > > > Can someone eyeball the schema and see if they see anything wrong? > > Once I fixed the well-formedness errors in the instance document and > the included schema, this seemed to work fine. The wellformedness > errors were a typo in the end tag </VisaCaseNumber> (should be > </CaseNumber>) in the instance and a ' rather than a " closing the > xmlns:vsi attribute in TestSharedNoInclude.xsd schema. > > But then, when these errors were present, I didn't get the error you > have above, so possibly the XML you posted wasn't the same that you > used. Or there might be something funny in the way that you're > invoking MSXML's validation. > > Cheers, > > Jeni > > --- > Jeni Tennison > http://www.jenitennison.com/ > > ------------------------------------------------- This mail was sent using www.Now2net.net
Received on Friday, 28 February 2003 11:25:57 UTC