- From: Anli Shundi <ashundi@tibco.com>
- Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 10:42:49 -0500
- To: "'Paul Warren'" <pdw@decisionsoft.com>, Anli Shundi <ashundi@tibco.com>
- Cc: "'daniella d'" <daneladg@yahoo.co.uk>, xmlschema-dev@w3.org
I think the regular expressions should be rewritten to escape the dot, i.e. <xsd:pattern value = "[0-9][\.][0-9]*"/> <xsd:pattern value = "[1-9][0-9]*[\.][0-9]*"/> <xsd:pattern value = "[1-9][0-9]*"/> If the dot is unescaped it matches any character, thus "[0-9][.][0-9]*" matches 0123. -Anli Anli Shundi TIBCO Software Inc. www.tibco.com > -----Original Message----- > From: Paul Warren [mailto:pdw@decisionsoft.com] > Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 10:28 AM > To: Anli Shundi > Cc: 'daniella d'; xmlschema-dev@w3.org > Subject: RE: Patterns and Decimal > > > On Thu, 2003-02-27 at 15:07, Anli Shundi wrote: > > See [1]: multiple patterns at the same type are interpreted as > > multiple OR branches. > > Yes. So given: > > <xsd:pattern value = "[0-9][.][0-9]*"/> > <xsd:pattern value = "[1-9][0-9]*[.][0-9]*"/> > <xsd:pattern value = "[1-9][0-9]*"/> > > 0123 is not valid according to any of the above patterns. > > daniella d [mailto:daneladg@yahoo.co.uk] wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > What you have written is exactly what I expect it to do. It > > does it all fine apart from the third pattern. It doesn't > > produce an error when I enter "0123". It seems to > be ignoring > > it. > > I don't see how that is related to the 3rd pattern any more than the > other 2. 0123 is not valid according to any of the 3 patterns. > > > I am using Xerces 2.3.0. I've tried writing them in > different > > ways but I can't get all three patterns to work together. > > I've tried the above using Xerces-J 1.4.4, Xerces-J 2 > (version 2.0.1, I > think) and Xerces-C. Works as expected on all of them. > > I attach my test example and schema. > > Paul > -- > Paul Warren, Client Services DecisionSoft Limited > +44-1865-203192 http://www.decisionsoft.com >
Received on Thursday, 27 February 2003 10:48:48 UTC