- From: Ashok Malhotra <ashokma@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 06:54:21 -0800
- To: "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
- Cc: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>, <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
My apologies! I misread the example. Dare and I had discussed a very
similar example that had maxOccurs=1 on the 'any'.
All the best, Ashok
-----Original Message-----
From: Henry S. Thompson [mailto:ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 6:50 AM
To: Ashok Malhotra
Cc: Dare Obasanjo; xmlschema-dev@w3.org
Subject: Re: Restricting Wildcards
"Ashok Malhotra" <ashokma@microsoft.com> writes:
> I'm really confused about this now. The base has an "any" that allows
> one element. The derived type replaces this with two elements. How
is
> this a valid restriction? I guess I'm missing a concept here.
The base has any any with max unbounded, that's why it _should_ allow
two elements in the restriction.
ht
--
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of
Edinburgh
Half-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is
forged spam]
Received on Wednesday, 26 February 2003 09:55:06 UTC