- From: Ashok Malhotra <ashokma@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 05:00:24 -0800
- To: "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>, "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
- Cc: <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
Henry:
I'm really confused about this now. The base has an "any" that allows
one element. The derived type replaces this with two elements. How is
this a valid restriction? I guess I'm missing a concept here.
All the best, Ashok
-----Original Message-----
From: Henry S. Thompson [mailto:ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 1:14 AM
To: Dare Obasanjo
Cc: xmlschema-dev@w3.org; www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
Subject: Re: Restricting Wildcards
"Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com> writes:
> Is the following restriction valid:
>
> BASE:
> <xs:sequence minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="1">
> <xs:any namespace="##any" processContents="skip" minOccurs="1"
maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
> </xs:sequence>
>
>
> DERIVED:
> <xs:sequence minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="1">
> <xs:element name="A" minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="unbounded" />
> <xs:element name="B" minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="unbounded" />
> </xs:sequence>
>
> 2 There is a complete *order-preserving* functional mapping from the
particles in the {particles} of R to the particles in the {particles} of
B such that all of the following must be true:
> [Definition:] A complete functional mapping is order-preserving if
each particle r in the domain R maps to a particle b in the range B
which follows (not necessarily immediately) the particle in the range B
mapped to by the predecessor of r, if any, where "predecessor" and
"follows" are defined with respect to the order of the lists which
constitute R and B. "
Yup, that looks like a bug to me. A similar problem would arise with
substitution groups, which are also an implicit disjunction, were it
not for the explicit statement that they are treated _as_ a
disjunction for checking restriction. We should have said something
similar for wildcards.
I say 'bug' because I think it's clear the _intention_ was that this
should be valid -- certainly the set of valid instances of the
'derived' type def. is a (proper) subset of the set of valid instances
of
the base type def.
ht
--
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of
Edinburgh
Half-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is
forged spam]
Received on Wednesday, 26 February 2003 08:00:27 UTC