- From: Ashok Malhotra <ashokma@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 05:00:24 -0800
- To: "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>, "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com>
- Cc: <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
Henry: I'm really confused about this now. The base has an "any" that allows one element. The derived type replaces this with two elements. How is this a valid restriction? I guess I'm missing a concept here. All the best, Ashok -----Original Message----- From: Henry S. Thompson [mailto:ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk] Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 1:14 AM To: Dare Obasanjo Cc: xmlschema-dev@w3.org; www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org Subject: Re: Restricting Wildcards "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@microsoft.com> writes: > Is the following restriction valid: > > BASE: > <xs:sequence minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="1"> > <xs:any namespace="##any" processContents="skip" minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="unbounded"/> > </xs:sequence> > > > DERIVED: > <xs:sequence minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="1"> > <xs:element name="A" minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="unbounded" /> > <xs:element name="B" minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="unbounded" /> > </xs:sequence> > > 2 There is a complete *order-preserving* functional mapping from the particles in the {particles} of R to the particles in the {particles} of B such that all of the following must be true: > [Definition:] A complete functional mapping is order-preserving if each particle r in the domain R maps to a particle b in the range B which follows (not necessarily immediately) the particle in the range B mapped to by the predecessor of r, if any, where "predecessor" and "follows" are defined with respect to the order of the lists which constitute R and B. " Yup, that looks like a bug to me. A similar problem would arise with substitution groups, which are also an implicit disjunction, were it not for the explicit statement that they are treated _as_ a disjunction for checking restriction. We should have said something similar for wildcards. I say 'bug' because I think it's clear the _intention_ was that this should be valid -- certainly the set of valid instances of the 'derived' type def. is a (proper) subset of the set of valid instances of the base type def. ht -- Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh Half-time member of W3C Team 2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/ [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
Received on Wednesday, 26 February 2003 08:00:27 UTC