- From: Noah Mendelsohn/Cambridge/IBM <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 08:29:10 -0500
- To: Raju MP <mail2me_raju@yahoo.com>
- Cc: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
Raju MP: >> I need to validate the Date format CCYYMMDD which is >> different from the ISO 8601 Date format CCYY-MM-DD. >> How can I do this validation in the XMLSchema by using >> W3C Date datatype. The short answer is that you cannot validate it as a date. You can, of course, make subtypes of string (or token if you prefer) that will recognize the pattern, but they will not be considered to be dates, and won't benefit from the associated range checking facets such as minInclusive/maxInclusive. The fact is that building date types that would meet everyone's needs is a daunting, perhaps impractical task. In various parts of the world, different calendars and conventions and used. These can be as simple as locales in the same country that adopt anomolous daylight saving conventions, and include such very deep issues as lunar vs. solar calendars. How do you compare a lunar to a solar date? Of course, that's before you get to the potentially simpler problem of your request, which is that there is a tremendous variety in the conventions used to represent even the same date. We eventually considered two fundamental approaches. One would have allowed users to build their own date types, by writing code to do the validation, range checking etc. In general, schema has avoided any feature that involves pluggable code, as such features tend not to interoperate. If I write my date type validator as a Java bean, can you run it in .Net? In Cobol? The other alternative is the one we chose: which is to implement a single date/time convention, based on a standard (ISO 8601) that is admittedly centered on Western solar calendars, but that would at least make possible a fairly broad range of computer applications. If your dates are stored in some other form (binary, CCYYMMDD, whatever) you will have to convert them if you want to use the Schema data types. I don't speak officially for the Schema WG, but I think this is a fairly good summary of how we wound up with the date/time features in the current language. I hope it explains the reasons for our lack of support of the format that you have requested. ------------------------------------------------------------------ Noah Mendelsohn Voice: 1-617-693-4036 IBM Corporation Fax: 1-617-693-8676 One Rogers Street Cambridge, MA 02142 ------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Tuesday, 25 February 2003 08:33:18 UTC