- From: Dare Obasanjo <dareo@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 08:48:37 -0800
- To: "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>, "Xan Gregg" <xan@tibco.com>
- Cc: <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
Not this again. So how are implementations supposed to validate the <xs:annotation> elements?
-----Original Message-----
From: Henry S. Thompson [mailto:ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk]
Sent: Thu 2/13/2003 6:34 AM
To: Xan Gregg
Cc: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
Subject: Re: use of xs:annotation outside of schema
Xan Gregg <xan@tibco.com> writes:
> Is it OK to re-use something like xs:annotation for my own schemas? That
> is, I want to allow annotation of elements in my instance documents, and it
> seems xs:annotation provides just what I want.
Sounds OK to me. I can imagine implementations which wouldn't do the
right thing, but I think they'd be wrong.
ht
--
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
Half-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
Received on Thursday, 13 February 2003 11:49:13 UTC