- From: Xan Gregg <xan@tibco.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 14:27:54 -0500
- To: "'Hugh Wallis'" <hugh_wallis@hyperion.com>, xmlschema-dev@w3.org
- Message-ID: <339902DC0E58D411986A00B0D03D84320186AA7C@extmail.rtp.tibco.com>
Hugh, I don't think there's a better answer than Amy Lewis's on xml-dev [1]. I prefer the first of your options, except with integer instead of decimal for the parts. A google search finds a similar datatype defined by something call "ebiz" [2]. xan [1] http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200302/msg00360.html <http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200302/msg00360.html> [2] http://www.posc.org/ebiz/pefxml/bdoc/dt_rational.html <http://www.posc.org/ebiz/pefxml/bdoc/dt_rational.html> -----Original Message----- From: Hugh Wallis [mailto:hugh_wallis@hyperion.com] Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 12:43 PM To: xmlschema-dev@w3.org Subject: Best way to represent fractional values? Because some fractional values (e.g. 1/3) cannot be exactly represented using any of the types provided by XML Schema (due to the recurring nature of their decimal representation) I want to define a new type that will enable exact representation of such values. As I see it there are two possibilities: 1) Create a complex type with a denominator and numerator, possibly something like: <complexType name="fraction"> <sequence> <element name="numerator" type="decimal"/> <element name="denominator" type="decimal"/> </sequence> </complexType> 2) Create a simple type as a restriction on "string", possibly something like: <simpleType name="fraction"> <restriction base="string"> <pattern value="[0-9]+(.[0-9]+)/[0-9]+(.[0-9]+)"/> </restriction> </simpleType> Both of these approaches have their benefits and pitfalls of course. Are there any "best practices" in this regard? It seems a pity that there was no fraction type defined for us in the first place (or am I missing something somewhere?) Many thanks Hugh Wallis
Received on Wednesday, 12 February 2003 14:33:28 UTC