- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: 02 Apr 2003 09:35:31 +0100
- To: "Alessandro Triglia" <sandro@mclink.it>
- Cc: "[Public XML Schema-DEV]" <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
"Alessandro Triglia" <sandro@mclink.it> writes: > Hi > > Does the following: > > --------------------------- > 3.10.1 The Wildcard Schema Component > > [...] > > strict > > There must be a top-level declaration for the item available, or the > item must have an xsi:type, and the item must be .valid. as appropriate. > > --------------------------- > > mean that the *local name* of the element i.i. (matching a wildcard) is > not constrained when the element carries an xsi:type attribute? That's correct. The basic point of 'strict' is that each element must be validated with a type definition. This is achieved via the xsi:type, so we're happy. ht -- Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh Half-time member of W3C Team 2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/ [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
Received on Wednesday, 2 April 2003 03:35:33 UTC