- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: 02 Apr 2003 09:35:31 +0100
- To: "Alessandro Triglia" <sandro@mclink.it>
- Cc: "[Public XML Schema-DEV]" <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
"Alessandro Triglia" <sandro@mclink.it> writes:
> Hi
>
> Does the following:
>
> ---------------------------
> 3.10.1 The Wildcard Schema Component
>
> [...]
>
> strict
>
> There must be a top-level declaration for the item available, or the
> item must have an xsi:type, and the item must be .valid. as appropriate.
>
> ---------------------------
>
> mean that the *local name* of the element i.i. (matching a wildcard) is
> not constrained when the element carries an xsi:type attribute?
That's correct.
The basic point of 'strict' is that each element must be validated
with a type definition. This is achieved via the xsi:type, so we're
happy.
ht
--
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
Half-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
Received on Wednesday, 2 April 2003 03:35:33 UTC