- From: Saul Farber <saul@syncline.com>
- Date: 09 Sep 2002 16:29:01 -0400
- To: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
- Message-Id: <1031603341.10320.109.camel@saul.internal.syncline.com>
Hello experts! I'm trying to restrict a complexType which declares a required attribute (use="required" on the base type). Base Type: <element name="baseElt" type="tns:baseType" /> <complexType name="baseType"> <sequence> <element name="blah" type="any" /> </sequence> <attribute name="type" use="required" type="string" /> </complexType> In my restricted type I am trying to "fix" the value of that "type" attribute in my derived type. For example: <element name="derivedElt" type="tns:derivedType" /> <complexType name="derivedType"> <complexContent> <restriction base="tns:baseType"> <sequence> <element name="blah" type="any" /> </sequence> <attribute name="type" use="required" type="string" fixed="derivedTypeType" /> </restriction> </complexContent> </complexType> So far so good...my problem is that I don't want people to have to explicitly DECLARE the type on my derived type. I would like people to be able to write the following: <derivedElt> ...derivedElt conten goes here... </derivedElt> and have the "type" attribute be inserted upon validation -> leading to the following xml (post validation) <derivedElt type="derivedType"> ...de content goes here </derivedElt> As far as I can tell, however, attributes are only "inserted" with pre-defined values when their "use" attribute is declared "optional". I don't have control over the schema of the base type in this case (it's a handed-down schema), and I'd like to allow my users to forgo the explicit declaration of the "type" attribute on their <derivedElt> instances. Any ideas? thanks! --saul
Received on Monday, 9 September 2002 16:27:04 UTC