- From: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 14:03:30 -0400
- To: "Eric Jain" <Eric.Jain@isb-sib.ch>
- Cc: "xmlschema-dev" <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
Eric Jain writes: >> I guess in order to express co-occurrence >> constraints in a general way you would >> need some kind of if-then-else constructs. Or something schematron-like based on some combination of fuller XPath, XSLT, etc. I'd really like to make sure if we go that way that the possibilities for optimized performance are in then same range as what we have today, that streaming is no worse than what you'd expect (co-occurrence always involves keeping a bit of data aside to deal with forward references, but what we have today is essentially just the key data, and is completely predictable as you first encounter the instance data), and I'd really prefer to have all constraints as part of the type system. Anyway, it's something that would take some serious design work to get right. Other than my concerns about the risks of complicating an already complex language, I do hope we get to it. I think it's the most consistent requirement we hear from users, at least as to a missing feature. Thanks. ------------------------------------------------------------------ Noah Mendelsohn Voice: 1-617-693-4036 IBM Corporation Fax: 1-617-693-8676 One Rogers Street Cambridge, MA 02142 ------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Monday, 9 September 2002 14:05:00 UTC