- From: Dare Obasanjo <dareo@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2002 13:45:55 -0800
- To: "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>, <Simon.Cox@csiro.au>
- Cc: <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
Upon investigating the W3C XML Schema Structures specification I've had some difficulty locating where it specifies that one-to-many particle derivations are acceptable. I would appreciate a pointer to where in the recommendation it mentions that this is possible. From what I've read[0] particle derivation is a one-to-one affair. Thanks. [0] http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xmlschema-1-20010502/#cd-model-restriction -- THINGS TO DO IF I BECOME AN EVIL OVERLORD #230 I will not procrastinate regarding any ritual granting immortality. > -----Original Message----- > From: Henry S. Thompson [mailto:ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk] > Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 2:28 AM > To: Simon.Cox@csiro.au > Cc: xmlschema-dev@w3.org > Subject: Re: Derivation by restriction from <any> > > > Simon.Cox@csiro.au writes: > > > Is it possible to derive by restriction starting with an <any>? > > > > e.g. > > > > <complexType name="basetype"> > > <sequence> > > <any maxOccurs="unbounded"/> > > </sequence> > > </complexType> > > > > <complexType name="newtype"> > > <complexContent> > > <restriction base="my:basetype"> > > <sequence> > > <element name="e1" type="string"/> > > <element name="e2" type="integer" minOccurs="0"/> > > <element name="e3" type="date" minOccurs="0"/> > > </sequence> > > </restriction> > > </complexContent> > > </complexType> > > Yes, that should be fine. > > ht > -- > Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, > University of Edinburgh > W3C Fellow 1999--2001, part-time member of W3C Team > 2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) > 131 650-4440 > Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk > URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/ > >
Received on Thursday, 7 March 2002 16:46:28 UTC