- From: Bob Schloss <rschloss@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 11:58:16 -0500
- To: mogot@web.de, xmlschema-dev@w3.org
Besides declaring the namespaces of MathML and/or XHTML in your schemas,
you may want to define your own complexType for the content of element TexT
in which you include wildcard particles, such as
<xs:any namespace="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" processContents
="skip" minOccurs="0"/>
(you could use processContents="lax").
Please see these sections of the Schema spec:
http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#Wildcards
http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#Complex_Type_Definitions
I think it would be nice to have a fuller explanation of this as a question
in the XML Schema FAQ:
http://www.schemavalid.com/faq/xml-schema.html
Good luck,
Bob
mogot@web.de@w3.org on 02/13/2002 05:22:05 AM
Sent by: xmlschema-dev-request@w3.org
To: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
cc:
Subject: Formattings in XML Document!
Hello people,
I defined the structure of a document in a schema. In generated XML
documents I would like to apply the formatting as bold, turned up , turned
down and to apply mathematical signs without defining the needed signs in
my schema for that.
The formatting and additional characters are supposed to occur per example
in a element <TexT> ..</TexT>. This element was defined as string in the
schema. Is it possible that I only declare the Namespaces of MathML
(Mathematical Markup Language) and xhtml to include the W3C schemas of
these elements (as <mrow>..</mrow> <mn>..</mn> and <sup>..</sup>,
<sub>..<sub>) in my primary schema and to use these in the <TexT> element
without defining these elements?
Please help me fast, it is urgent.
________________________________________________________________
Keine verlorenen Lotto-Quittungen, keine vergessenen Gewinne mehr!
Beim WEB.DE Lottoservice: http://tippen2.web.de/?x=13
Received on Wednesday, 13 February 2002 11:59:49 UTC