- From: Bob Schloss <rschloss@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 11:58:16 -0500
- To: mogot@web.de, xmlschema-dev@w3.org
Besides declaring the namespaces of MathML and/or XHTML in your schemas, you may want to define your own complexType for the content of element TexT in which you include wildcard particles, such as <xs:any namespace="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" processContents ="skip" minOccurs="0"/> (you could use processContents="lax"). Please see these sections of the Schema spec: http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#Wildcards http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#Complex_Type_Definitions I think it would be nice to have a fuller explanation of this as a question in the XML Schema FAQ: http://www.schemavalid.com/faq/xml-schema.html Good luck, Bob mogot@web.de@w3.org on 02/13/2002 05:22:05 AM Sent by: xmlschema-dev-request@w3.org To: xmlschema-dev@w3.org cc: Subject: Formattings in XML Document! Hello people, I defined the structure of a document in a schema. In generated XML documents I would like to apply the formatting as bold, turned up , turned down and to apply mathematical signs without defining the needed signs in my schema for that. The formatting and additional characters are supposed to occur per example in a element <TexT> ..</TexT>. This element was defined as string in the schema. Is it possible that I only declare the Namespaces of MathML (Mathematical Markup Language) and xhtml to include the W3C schemas of these elements (as <mrow>..</mrow> <mn>..</mn> and <sup>..</sup>, <sub>..<sub>) in my primary schema and to use these in the <TexT> element without defining these elements? Please help me fast, it is urgent. ________________________________________________________________ Keine verlorenen Lotto-Quittungen, keine vergessenen Gewinne mehr! Beim WEB.DE Lottoservice: http://tippen2.web.de/?x=13
Received on Wednesday, 13 February 2002 11:59:49 UTC