- From: Mark Feblowitz <mfeblowitz@frictionless.com>
- Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2002 18:30:29 -0500
- To: "'ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk'" <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
- Cc: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org, xmlschema-dev@w3.org
As I understand it, such a representation is inextensible. Would there be any way to use this in a context where extension was possible, and especially where the extended content could also occur in any order? Thanks Mark ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- Mark Feblowitz [t] 617.715.7231 Frictionless Commerce Incorporated [f] 617.495.0188 XML Architect [e] mfeblowitz@frictionless.com 400 Technology Square, 9th Floor Cambridge, MA 02139 www.frictionless.com -----Original Message----- From: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk [mailto:ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk] Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 4:06 AM To: Christopher Birkett Cc: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org; xmlschema-dev@w3.org Subject: Re: all group maxOccurs cannot be unbounded limitation Christopher Birkett <christopherbirkett@yahoo.com> writes: > Hello, > Can someone explain to me how to specify any order of > elements and any occurence for each? I need xsd:all > with child elements' maxOccurs="unbounded", but this > does not seem to be valid. So how else can I do it? <xs:choice maxOccurs="unbounded"> <xs:element ref="..."/> <xs:element ref="..."/> <xs:element ref="..."/> </xs:choice> This gives you any order, any number. > Also, I really do not understand why this limitation > was put in and why it cannot be turned off. Can > someone explain to me the logic behind this decision? This is a FAQ, there's a number of earlier threads about it, sorry can't immediately lay my hands on a pointer. ht -- Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh W3C Fellow 1999--2001, part-time member of W3C Team 2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
Received on Tuesday, 5 February 2002 18:31:01 UTC