- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: 16 Dec 2002 13:53:44 +0000
- To: <sre@bizpartner.no>
- Cc: <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
"Steinar Rune Eriksen" <sre@bizpartner.no> writes:
> hi
>
> This construction used to work 6 months ago... (using XML Spy 3.5 under
> xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" )
>
> <complexType name="Price">
> <simpleContent>
> <restriction base="double">
> <fractionDigits value="2"/>
> <attribute name="currency" type="string"
> use="required"/>
> </restriction >
> </simpleContent>
> </complexType>
>
> Using XML Spy 5, I get a validation error on restriction _base_, seeming
> that this is not valid anymore. I cannot find any examples either of
> restrction being used as child under simpleContent, though it seems like it
> should be valid according to spec. Am I wrong?
The old behaviour was a bug -- you're trying to restrict (with a
facet) and extend (with an attribute) at the same time -- not allowed,
sorry. You'll have to do it in two steps, either order is OK.
ht
--
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
W3C Fellow 1999--2002, part-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
Received on Monday, 16 December 2002 08:53:39 UTC