- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: 05 Dec 2002 08:30:35 +0000
- To: "Morris Matsa" <mmatsa@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
"Morris Matsa" <mmatsa@us.ibm.com> writes:
> We've been having discussions about which of these are legal in a schema,
> based on inferences in various parts of the spec which might contradict
> each other.
>
> Which of the four are legal?
>
> <xsd:schema xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">
> <xsd:element name="one" type="xsd:anySimpleType" />
> <xsd:element name="two" type="xsd:anyType" />
> <xsd:attribute name="three" type="xsd:anySimpleType" />
> <xsd:attribute name="four" type="xsd:anyType" />
> </xsd:schema>
>
> SQC XSV
> one ok ok
> two ok ok
> three ok ok
> four ok bad [1]
Forthcoming errata will clarify this -- XSV is (will be) correct.
ht
--
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
W3C Fellow 1999--2002, part-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
Received on Thursday, 5 December 2002 03:30:35 UTC