- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: 16 Nov 2001 20:02:45 +0000
- To: Ross Thompson <rthompson@contivo.com>
- Cc: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
Ross Thompson <rthompson@contivo.com> writes:
> ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk writes:
> > I think this should have read
> >
> > 4.2.1 If the {variety} is list, then the {final} of the {item type
> > definition} must not contain list.
> > 4.2.2 If the {variety} is union, then the {final} of each of the {member type
> > definitions} must not contain union.
>
> The motivation for 4.2.1 is easy to guess. Why is 4.2.2 there? It
> seems to me that XMLSchema without that rule is perfectly meaningful.
Well, if final='list' means you can't make lists out of this type,
then surely final='union' means you can't make unions including this
type.
I don't think _either_ makes much sense, but they're there for
completeness.
ht
--
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
W3C Fellow 1999--2001, part-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
Received on Friday, 16 November 2001 15:01:47 UTC