- From: Ross Thompson <rthompson@contivo.com>
- Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 08:43:08 -0800
- To: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
- Cc: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk writes: > I think this should have read > > 4.2.1 If the {variety} is list, then the {final} of the {item type > definition} must not contain list. > 4.2.2 If the {variety} is union, then the {final} of each of the {member type > definitions} must not contain union. The motivation for 4.2.1 is easy to guess. Why is 4.2.2 there? It seems to me that XMLSchema without that rule is perfectly meaningful. - Roß --- To succeed in the world it is not enough to be stupid, you must also be well-mannered. -- Voltaire
Received on Friday, 16 November 2001 11:43:16 UTC