- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: 16 Nov 2001 10:26:46 +0000
- To: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
- Cc: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com> writes:
> Just wondering how a recursive group such as:
>
> <xs:group name="group">
> <xs:sequence>
> <xs:element name="foo">
> <xs:complexType>
> <xs:group ref="group" minOccurs="0"/>
> </xs:complexType>
> </xs:element>
> <xs:element name="bar" type="xs:token"/>
> </xs:sequence>
> </xs:group>
>
> may be redefine without confusion between the <xs:group ref="group"/> meaning
> "extension", the <xs:group ref="group" minOccurs="0"/> meaning "bogus
> extension" the <xs:group ref="group" minOccurs="0"/> meaning "reference" ???
I don't see the problem here. In the _redefinition_, the details of
the original definition are irrelevant, and it's the redefinition with
respect which the constraints are expressed.
ht
--
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
W3C Fellow 1999--2001, part-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
Received on Friday, 16 November 2001 05:25:46 UTC