- From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 19:42:48 +0100
- To: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
Just wondering how a recursive group such as: <xs:group name="group"> <xs:sequence> <xs:element name="foo"> <xs:complexType> <xs:group ref="group" minOccurs="0"/> </xs:complexType> </xs:element> <xs:element name="bar" type="xs:token"/> </xs:sequence> </xs:group> may be redefine without confusion between the <xs:group ref="group"/> meaning "extension", the <xs:group ref="group" minOccurs="0"/> meaning "bogus extension" the <xs:group ref="group" minOccurs="0"/> meaning "reference" ??? Thanks Eric -- Rendez-vous à Paris pour le Forum XML. http://www.technoforum.fr/Pages/forumXML01/index.html ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Eric van der Vlist http://xmlfr.org http://dyomedea.com http://xsltunit.org http://4xt.org http://examplotron.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Tuesday, 13 November 2001 13:42:58 UTC