- From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 19:42:48 +0100
- To: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
Just wondering how a recursive group such as:
<xs:group name="group">
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element name="foo">
<xs:complexType>
<xs:group ref="group" minOccurs="0"/>
</xs:complexType>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name="bar" type="xs:token"/>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:group>
may be redefine without confusion between the <xs:group ref="group"/>
meaning "extension", the <xs:group ref="group" minOccurs="0"/> meaning
"bogus extension" the <xs:group ref="group" minOccurs="0"/> meaning
"reference" ???
Thanks
Eric
--
Rendez-vous à Paris pour le Forum XML.
http://www.technoforum.fr/Pages/forumXML01/index.html
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric van der Vlist http://xmlfr.org http://dyomedea.com
http://xsltunit.org http://4xt.org http://examplotron.org
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Tuesday, 13 November 2001 13:42:58 UTC