- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
 - Date: 01 Nov 2001 14:09:52 +0000
 - To: Mark Feblowitz <mfeblowitz@frictionless.com>
 - Cc: "'Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com'" <Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com>, "'xmlschema-dev@w3.org'" <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
 
Mark Feblowitz <mfeblowitz@frictionless.com> writes:
> I'm not sure if I saw it in the spec or in an xmlschema-dev discussion, but
> I recall seeing that duplications cannot be handled at a file level - they
> must be handled on a definition-by-definition basis, comparing each for
> equivalence (or is it identity?). If that is the case, then tools would be
> "cheating" by simply looking at file references. 
The NOTE at the end of section 4.2.1 [1] reads as follows:
  "The above is carefully worded so that multiple <include>ing of the
  same schema document will not constitute a violation of clause 2 of
  Schema Properties Correct (3.15.6), but applications are allowed,
  indeed encouraged, to avoid <include>ing the same schema document
  more than once to forestall the necessity of establishing identity
  component by component."
ht
[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#compound-schema
-- 
  Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
          W3C Fellow 1999--2001, part-time member of W3C Team
     2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
	    Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
		     URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
Received on Thursday, 1 November 2001 09:19:03 UTC