- From: Forge <forge@neonics.com>
- Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 17:40:35 +0000 (UTC)
- To: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
Hi there,
I checked the xml specs and it says:
complexType
abstract = boolean : false
block = (#all | List of (extension | restriction))
final = (#all | List of (extension | restriction))
id = ID
mixed = boolean : false
name = NCName
{any attributes with non-schema namespace . . .}>
Content: (annotation?, (simpleContent | complexContent | ((group | all |
choice | sequence)?, ((attribute | attributeGroup)*, anyAttribute?))))
</complexType>
Which means to me that the following is valid:
<xsd:complexType name="bla">
<xsd:simpleContent>
<xsd:restriction ....>
</xsd:simpleContent>
<xsd:attribute name="..."/>
</xsd:complexType>
However, XMLSpy does not think so..
Then I found this example:
<xs:complexType name="length1">
<xs:simpleContent>
<xs:extension base="xs:non-negative-integer">
<xs:attribute name="unit" type="xs:NMTOKEN"/>
</xs:extension>
</xs:simpleContent>
</xs:complexType>
Is XMLSpy wrong?
Then:
I just wish to declare a tag like <blah blah="blah">blah</blah>
This is not possible with an anonymous complexType definition. How come?
What I would like to do is:
<element name="blah" type="xsd:string">
<complexType>
<xsd:attribute ...>
</complexType>
</element>
but this is not possible if element is not below the root node (haven't
tested it when it's below the root node, however..)
Any clarifications on this?
Thanks a lot!
Received on Wednesday, 28 March 2001 10:32:44 UTC