- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: 05 Mar 2001 16:38:37 +0000
- To: "Bob Schloss" <rschloss@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: Matt Brown <matt@avolent.com>, "'xmlschema-dev@w3.org'" <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
"Bob Schloss" <rschloss@us.ibm.com> writes: > There might be a way of specifying your own element, call it > MattAppInfo, and specifying that it is in the substitution group > with the appInfo element. Then your element would have a complex > type which would have the grammar you want. Actually this is not allowed, although it's so reasonable I wish it were. As it stands _no_ element in the xs: namespace can be substituted, because 'blockDefault' is '#all' at the top of the SforS. > Another approach would be to insert some kind of XLink element in > the content of appInfo which would point to your instructions held > in a parallel XML document. You can then have a schema for that > parallel document. That would work. ht -- Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh W3C Fellow 1999--2001, part-time member of W3C Team 2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
Received on Monday, 5 March 2001 11:38:42 UTC