- From: Martin Gudgin <marting@develop.com>
- Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 09:29:17 +0100
- To: <Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com>, <francis@redrice.com>
- Cc: <Curt.Arnold@hyprotech.com>, <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>, <ijs@decisionsoft.com>, <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
----- Original Message ----- From: <Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com> To: <francis@redrice.com> Cc: <Curt.Arnold@hyprotech.com>; <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>; <ijs@decisionsoft.com>; <xmlschema-dev@w3.org> Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2001 7:33 PM Subject: Re: Mixing schemaLocation and noNamespaceSchemaLocation? <SNIP> > <p:e a='2' xlmns:p="URIP"/> > > Of course there's a sense in which the attribute a is indirectly in > namespace URIP, but per the NS rec only element "e" is actually said to be > "in the namespace". Why should an unqualified local element be any > different? > Noah, I'm having a feeling of 'deja vu'. I had this argument over on XML-DEV[1] a few weeks ago... Gudge [1] http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200105/msg00493.html
Received on Friday, 22 June 2001 04:31:08 UTC