- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: 20 Jun 2001 14:45:29 +0100
- To: "Roger L. Costello" <costello@mitre.org>
- Cc: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
"Roger L. Costello" <costello@mitre.org> writes:
> The structure's spec repeatedly uses the following phrases:
>
> - intensional intersection
> - intensional union
> - intensional subset
>
> but does not define them.
Sure it does, as you quote below -- "as defined in Attribute Wildcard
Intersection", which in turn says "For a wildcard's {namespace
constraint} value to be the intensional intersection of two other such
values . . .", which is a definition of 'intensional intersection'.
> Can someone tell me what they mean?
<snip/>
> What if the above had just said ".. is the intersection of the ...".
> Would this sentence mean anything different?
Sure -- it would be incoherent -- intersection as such is an operation
on sets. A wildcard definition isn't a set, it's a characteristic
function for a (possibly infinite) set. By 'intensional' I mean that
the operation is defined at the characteristic function == descriptive
level, not the set level itself.
ht
--
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
W3C Fellow 1999--2001, part-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
Received on Wednesday, 20 June 2001 09:45:29 UTC