- From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 12:09:33 +0200
- To: "xmlschema-dev@w3.org" <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
Can anyone confirm which is right (my understanding or the primer) ?
Thanks
Eric
Eric van der Vlist wrote:
>
> Given the definition:
>
> <xs:element name="foo">
> ...
> <xs:unique name="uniqueFoo">
> <xs:selector xpath="bar"/>
> <xs:field xpath="id"/>
> </xs:unique>
> </xs:element>
>
> my understanding of the rec is that this can be read in plain english as
> "in each element foo, the sub elements bar identified by their id must
> be unique".
>
> In particular, the following paragraphs of part one:
>
> "{fields} specifies XPath expressions relative to each element selected
> by a {selector}. This must identify a single node (element or attribute)
> whose content or value, which must be of a simple type, is used in the
> constraint. It is possible to specify an ordered list of {fields}s, to
> cater to multi-field keys, keyrefs, and uniqueness constraints. "
>
> and
>
> "For each node in the ·target node set· all of the {fields}, with that
> node as the context node, evaluate to either an empty node-set or a
> node-set with exactly one member, which must have a simple type."
>
> let me think that each of the fields must identify a unique (or non
> existing) node in the context of each occurrence of a selector.
>
> If my interpretation is right, isn't it contrary to the example of
> composed key given in the primer:
>
> <unique name="dummy1">
> <selector xpath="r:regions/r:zip"/>
> <field xpath="@code"/>
> <field xpath="r:part/@number"/>
> </unique>
>
> where the field "r:part/@number" is pointing to 4 different nodes in
> this case:
>
> <regions>
> <zip code="95819">
> <part number="872-AA" quantity="1"/>
> <part number="926-AA" quantity="1"/>
> <part number="833-AA" quantity="1"/>
> <part number="455-BX" quantity="1"/>
> </zip>
> ...
>
> Thanks to let me know what I have wrong (or to confirm my
> understanding;) ) !
>
> Eric
> --
> Pour y voir plus clair dans la nebuleuse XML...
> http://dyomedea.com/formation/
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Eric van der Vlist http://xmlfr.org http://dyomedea.com
> http://xsltunit.org http://4xt.org http://examplotron.org
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Pour y voir plus clair dans la nebuleuse XML...
http://dyomedea.com/formation/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric van der Vlist http://xmlfr.org http://dyomedea.com
http://xsltunit.org http://4xt.org http://examplotron.org
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Tuesday, 19 June 2001 06:09:43 UTC