- From: Roger L. Costello <costello@mitre.org>
- Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2001 09:16:09 -0400
- To: xmlschema-dev@w3.org, "Costello,Roger L." <costello@mitre.org>
Question: Can a simpleType's "final" attribute have the value "extension"? For example: <simpleType name="foo" final="extension"> ... </simpleType> The information on this topic differs between the structure's spec and the datatype's spec (the former says it is a valid value, the later says it isn't). Here's what it says in section 3.14.1 of the structure's spec: "... the explicit values extension, restriction, list and union prevent further derivations by extension (to yield a complex type) and restriction (to yield a simple type) and use in constructing lists and unions respectively." And yet later, in section 3.14.2 it says: <simpleType final = (#all | (list | union | restriction)) Note that this says nothing about an extension value. Later on, in the same section we find: {final} As for the {prohibited substitutions} property of complex type definitions, but using the final and finalDefault [attributes] in place of the block and blockDefault [attributes] and with the relevant set being {extension, restriction, list, union} So, at one point in the structure's spec it says extension is a legal value for final, at another point it says that it's not legal, and then at a third point it's back to saying that it is legal. Now, if we turn to the datatype's spec, here's what it says: <simpleType id = ID final = #all | List of (restriction, list, union) This says that there is no extension value for final. Okay, I'm confused. What's the answer - is extension a legal value for the simpleType's final attribute? /Roger
Received on Saturday, 9 June 2001 09:17:39 UTC