- From: Robert Braddock <stormwarden@bigfoot.com>
- Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 15:18:29 -0600
- To: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
> > without violating this property, I appreciate if people design without > > global elements (I just use global complexTypes where I had global elements > > before). > > That's quite a constraint, though, especially where multiple namespaces > are involved since types behave differently than elements in this > context. I don't see what you mean here. My schemas just reference types through their schema's namespace, just like global elements would be referenced. I do this specifically for the multiple namespace case. Could you explain? Robert Braddock
Received on Friday, 12 January 2001 16:18:36 UTC