- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: 04 Jan 2001 18:23:35 +0000
- To: MarkH@i2.co.uk
- Cc: xmlschema-dev@w3.org, support@xmlspy.com
MarkH@i2.co.uk writes:
> <?xml version='1.0'?>
> <schema xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/10/XMLSchema'
> xmlns:vlvx='http://www.i2group.com/2001-01-01/VLVXSchema'
> targetNamespace='http://www.i2group.com/2001-01-01/VLVXSchema'>
>
> <complexType name='elementPropertyType'>
> <annotation>
> <documentation>Generic string property (name/value) on
> element</documentation>
> </annotation>
> <attribute name='name' type='string' use='required'/>
> <attribute name='value' type='string' use='required'/>
> </complexType>
>
> <complexType name='displayNamePropertyType'>
> <annotation>
> <documentation>Generic string property (name/value) on
> element</documentation>
> </annotation>
> <simpleContent>
> <restriction base='vlvx:elementPropertyType'>
> <attribute name='name' type='string' use='required'
> value='displayName'/>
> </restriction>
> </simpleContent>
> </complexType>
>
> Validating with XSV 1.173/1.80 of 2000/10/18 15:54:58 says everything is
> fine.
>
> Validation with XML Spy v3.5 beta 3 normally says its ok too - unless you
> modify the document externally and cause XML Spy to revalidate when it
> regains application focus. It then complains that simpleContent cannot have
> a base (vlvx:elementPropertyType) that is a complexType with complexContent.
>
> Who's right here? XML Spy is showing at least one bug here (reporting a
> validation error intermittently). But is XSV right to allow the above?
XSV is definitely wrong. Thanks for spotting this, I'll get a fix out
soon.
ht
--
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
W3C Fellow 1999--2001, part-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
Received on Thursday, 4 January 2001 13:23:38 UTC