- From: <kboo@ca.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 17:58:39 -0400
- To: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
- Cc: "Jun Wang" <t-junw@microsoft.com>, "Aung Aung" <aaung@microsoft.com>, <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
> Part II: > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > Aung: > >> How about this: should this work? (how/why?) > >> C: > >> <root> > >> <element name="a"> > >> <key name="A"> > >> </element> > >> <element name="b"> > >> <keyref refer="A"> > >> </element> > >> </root> > > Priscilla: > > No, because the key and keyref have to be defined in the same element, > or > the key has to be defined in a child element. Neither is the case here. > ht: > Not quite, Priscilla -- since <b> is unconstrained, in a valid > instance an <a> might occur inside it, so the above is OK. Could you give me an example of a valid instance that shows the above is ok? - Ki
Received on Wednesday, 22 August 2001 17:59:12 UTC