- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: 22 Aug 2001 22:20:19 +0100
- To: "Jun Wang" <t-junw@microsoft.com>
- Cc: "Aung Aung" <aaung@microsoft.com>, <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>
"Jun Wang" <t-junw@microsoft.com> writes: > Could you give out some comments according to some skipped parts in > Aung's emails? > > Part I : > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > Aung: > >> B: (this is what you and Eric come agreeement on how it should work, > > >> if that is the case, how do you defind the scopeof > >> the key 'B'? it cannot be all the way to the root element, can it? ) > >> <root> <element name="a"> > >> <keyref refer="B"> > >> <element name="b"> > >> <key name="B"> > >> </element> > >> </element> > >> </root> > > Priscilla: > >The scope of the key 'B' is the element 'b'. All values of the > field(s) have to be unique within an instance of 'b'. > > Aung: > 1. If scope of the key 'B' is the element 'b', then how can the <keyref > refer="B">, which is outside of scope of element 'b', see the <key > name="B"> ? > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > I have the same question as Aung. And if you can give out some specific > example or issue in Databases area which brings you to think > IDConstraint should be implemented this way, our understanding will be > even clearer... The declaration for any element which may contain <b> elements at any depth can sensibly contain a keyref definition which references that key. > Part II: > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > Aung: > >> How about this: should this work? (how/why?) > >> C: > >> <root> > >> <element name="a"> > >> <key name="A"> > >> </element> > >> <element name="b"> > >> <keyref refer="A"> > >> </element> > >> </root> > > Priscilla: > > No, because the key and keyref have to be defined in the same element, > or > the key has to be defined in a child element. Neither is the case here. Not quite, Priscilla -- since <b> is unconstrained, in a valid instance an <a> might occur inside it, so the above is OK. > Aung: > OK, simply put, we agree with 2 easy cases, lets put it here ... > case 2. if key and keyref are declared in different scope it, should > fail. > <r> > <a> > key=1 > </a> > <b> > keyref=1 > </b> > </r> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Yes, fails. ht -- Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh W3C Fellow 1999--2001, part-time member of W3C Team 2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
Received on Wednesday, 22 August 2001 17:19:58 UTC