- From: Sean Palmer <wapdesign@wapdesign.org.uk>
- Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 13:08:12 -0000
- To: "Martin Gudgin" <marting@develop.com>
- Cc: <xmlschema-dev@w3.org>, "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
> > > Will XSV be able to cope with a modularized version > > > of XHTML recasted into > > > XML Schema(?) - i.e.could we use it in its current > > > state to competently > > > validate an XHTML Family. > > I hope so :-) > [MJG] > I can confirm that the redefine support in XSV does work; I've tried some > simple examples. You can find 'base' schema at[1], importing schema at[2] > and instance at[3]. These are just adding an xml:lang attribute to a complex > type but I think they illustrate the principal. These instances work, but will it work for an XML Schmea version of m12n - which will be a lot more complex? The real issue is: can XSV be modified to validate the constraints set out in the m12n specification [1] This is all speculative, becuase there might not even *be* an XML Schema version of m12n; but let's hope so! c.f. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-html-editor/2000OctDec/0065.html [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-modularization/xhtml-modularization-20001020.html #s_conform Kindest Regards, Sean B. Palmer ---------------------------------------------------- WAP Tech Info - http://www.waptechinfo.com/ Mysterylights.com - http://www.mysterylights.com/ XHTML Modularization Resource - http://xhtml.waptechinfo.com/modularization/ ---------------------------------------------------- "The Internet; is that thing still around?" - Homer J. Simpson
Received on Monday, 30 October 2000 08:11:32 UTC