- From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
- Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2000 18:21:22 +0100
- To: Liz Castro <lcastro@cookwood.com>
- CC: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
Liz, Liz Castro wrote: > > As far as I can tell from Datatypes 3.3.27, the format of an element of > type xsd:date should be CCCC-MM-DD. But when I validate: > > <last_modified>May 16, 1999</last_modified> > > or even > > <last_modified>fried potatoes</last_modified> > > against > > <xsd:element name="last_modified" type="xsd:date"/> > > XSV gives me no error. Is that a bug, or doesn't it care what the date > looks like? You should have a look at the xsv status page [1] under "3.2. Not implemented yet" : "Simple type conformance, other than enumerations and max/min for numeric types " Hope this helps. Eric [1] http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/xsv-status.html > Thanks, > Liz > > _______________ > Liz Castro > Cookwood Press > mailto:lcastro@cookwood.com > http://www.cookwood.com -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Eric van der Vlist Dyomedea http://dyomedea.com http://xmlfr.org http://4xt.org http://ducotede.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Monday, 6 November 2000 12:21:36 UTC