- From: Simon St.Laurent <simonstl@simonstl.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2000 09:38:02 -0400
- To: "Martin J. Duerst" <duerst@w3.org>, xmlschema-dev@w3.org
At 11:10 AM 7/11/00 +0900, Martin J. Duerst wrote: >Well, I guess you get them from the net, or you get them via >some other medium, such as a floppy. The easiest way to do >things (easiest for the end user) is to make sure your >application has a reasonable local cache built in. >I think both libwww and jigsaw (both available as open >source from W3C) include that. Caching is a wonderful answer, provided you have access to the original or an acceptable mapping to a substitute. Presently neither is reliable. >>Sadly, I think my question remains largely unanswered, but given the >>current state of URI processing, I think it's wiser to take it to a >>different forum. > >It looks like you seem there is a problem with the current state of >URI processing. Can you be more specific? Certainly, but I've already moved it to xml-dev: http://www.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/2000/07/0265.html Simon St.Laurent XML Elements of Style / XML: A Primer, 2nd Ed. http://www.simonstl.com - XML essays and books
Received on Tuesday, 11 July 2000 09:35:28 UTC