- From: Martin J. Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2000 11:10:09 +0900
- To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>, xmlschema-dev@w3.org
At 00/07/10 10:31 -0400, Simon St.Laurent wrote: >At 03:03 PM 7/10/00 +0100, Henry S. Thompson wrote: > >> I don't find targetNamespace useful if I can't find a local copy of the > >> schema in the first place... > > > >Um, I'm lost. We're discussing a case where an instance uses various > >namespaces, schema documents for which I have local copies of. What > >it _means_ to have a schema document for a namespace is to have a > >schema document whose 'targetNamespace' attribute is the name of that > >namespace. So when I provide those local copies to the > >schema-validation process, I've essentially provided both LHS > >(targetNamespace) and RHS (local filename for schema document) > >for a catalog. > >I thought the question was regarding how to provide those local copies Well, I guess you get them from the net, or you get them via some other medium, such as a floppy. The easiest way to do things (easiest for the end user) is to make sure your application has a reasonable local cache built in. I think both libwww and jigsaw (both available as open source from W3C) include that. >Sadly, I think my question remains largely unanswered, but given the >current state of URI processing, I think it's wiser to take it to a >different forum. It looks like you seem there is a problem with the current state of URI processing. Can you be more specific? Regards, Martin.
Received on Monday, 10 July 2000 22:44:37 UTC