- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 03:43:58 -0400
- To: Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
- Cc: xmlp-comments@w3.org
Hi Martin. I'm a bit surprised this action was taken before Noah and I had finished discussing the issue, but I understand that the discussion hasn't progressed very quickly due to my travel itinerary this month. I'll continue the discussion when I get some time, and we'll see what comes of that. Cheers, Mark. On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 03:43:25AM -0700, Martin Gudgin wrote: > Mark, > > You sent e-mail[1] to the XMLP comments list which resulted in Rec Issue > 31[2] being entered into the issues list. The XMLP WG has considered > your comments and concluded that it is not appropriate to address this > comment in a Proposed Edited Recommendation or Second Edition of SOAP > 1.2. It is also not clear that the XMLP WG is the most appropriate place > to deal with this issue, which, as you allude to, is not unique to SOAP. > > > Thus the XMLP WG is not going to take any action regarding this issue. > > If this resolution is NOT acceptable to you, please let the Working > Group know. > > Regards > > Martin Gudgin > For the XMLP WG > > [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xmlp-comments/2005Apr/0000.html > [2] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-rec-issues.html#x31 -- Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.ca Coactus; Web-inspired integration strategies http://www.coactus.com
Received on Wednesday, 25 May 2005 07:43:37 UTC