- From: Jun Fujisawa <fujisawa.jun@canon.co.jp>
- Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 00:40:45 +0900
- To: "Martin Gudgin" <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
- Cc: <xmlp-comments@w3.org>
Hi Martin, At 3:23 AM -0700 04.7.13, Martin Gudgin wrote: >You raised an issue, number 483[1] regarding langauge in section 1 of >the XOP specification[2]. The working group agrees that it is not clear >from the context why attribute content cannot be optimized. The reason, >that an element is used to indicate where content has been optimized, is >present in Paragraph 2 of Section 1, but the language you refer to is in >Paragraph 5. The two intervening paragraphs make the context unclear. >The Working Group will remove the text 'As a result,' from Section 5 so >that it reads: > >"Only element content can be optimized; attributes, >non-base64-compatible character data, and data not in the canonical >representation of the base64Binary datatype cannot be successfully >optimized by XOP." I'm happy with this resolution. -- Jun Fujisawa <mailto:fujisawa.jun@canon.co.jp>
Received on Tuesday, 13 July 2004 12:09:43 UTC