- From: Jun Fujisawa <fujisawa.jun@canon.co.jp>
- Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 00:40:42 +0900
- To: "Martin Gudgin" <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
- Cc: <xmlp-comments@w3.org>
Hi Martin, At 3:18 AM -0700 04.7.13, Martin Gudgin wrote: >You raised an issue, number 482[1] regarding reference to Base64 in >XOP[2]. The XMLP working group declined to adopt your suggestion as XOP >requires a canonical form of base64 and RFC3548[3] does not define such >a form. The XML Schema Part 2[4] specification does define such a form >which is why we reference that specification rather than RFC3548. I'm happy with this resolution. -- Jun Fujisawa <mailto:fujisawa.jun@canon.co.jp>
Received on Tuesday, 13 July 2004 12:09:43 UTC