- From: Joseph Reagle <reagle@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 15:21:52 +0200
- To: jose.kahan@w3.org
- Cc: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>, xml-encryption@w3.org, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
On Wednesday 26 May 2004 14:45, Jose Kahan wrote: > Unless there are some objections in this mailing list, I propose > we reuse the same request. Let's say that if we don't hear any complain > by Friday EOB, let's do it. Sounds good. > > One question, though. Will be need to edit the spec to say that > this is the MIME type or add an errata once it is accepted? W3C policy now says: [[[ 4.2. Update the introduction to the registration information in your specification to say either "registered with IANA at..." or "under review by the IESG...", as applicable. ]]] http://www.w3.org/2002/06/registering-mediatype.html#Planned It's a matter of W3C policy of whether you consider this retroactive and need an erratum for the spec. I don't see how it could hurt.
Received on Thursday, 27 May 2004 15:21:45 UTC