- From: Joseph Reagle <reagle@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 17:24:43 -0500
- To: "Takeshi Imamura" <IMAMU@jp.ibm.com>
- Cc: xml-encryption@w3.org
On Saturday 16 March 2002 05:25, Takeshi Imamura wrote: > Thanks, but I made some mistakes. Could you modify the status as > follows? [1] http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2002/02-xenc-interop.html new revision: 1.15 > >> Satisfactory Performance "" > >Would you like to propose a *rough* ballpark of what an implementation > >should be able to perform? Do you think this performance profile even > > makes sense? > > I have the same opinion as Merlin's. Ok, I'll still ask implementors to respond in the generic to the following question, "For your applications/purposes, is the performance satisfactory." Any other details I'll be happy to get (like size of documents, types of operation, type of platform, etc.), but I won't press that issue. -- Joseph Reagle Jr. http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/ W3C Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair http://www.w3.org/Signature/ W3C XML Encryption Chair http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/
Received on Monday, 18 March 2002 17:24:46 UTC