- From: Joseph Reagle <reagle@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 17:40:29 -0500
- To: merlin <merlin@baltimore.ie>
- Cc: xml-encryption@w3.org
On Monday 11 March 2002 16:38, merlin wrote: > Joseph, there's another set of interop samples at > lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-encryption/2002Mar/0008.html Ok, now listed in: http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2002/02-xenc-interop.html > You can put us down for Y across the board, with the > caveat that there appears to be a DH interop issue > and I'm not sure how much NFC impacts me. Ok, now Y down the board. If you'd like the column heading to refer to a Baltimore web page describing the implementation, please let me know. > There are two decryption transforms samples in the > referenced set; when we nail down our language I'll > produce a couple more. Great! On Xenc itself, and this transform I'm very interested on getting some ball park performance targets: the Y for the satisfactory performance. I don't need specific numbers for a given implementation but if we can document a high bound on an expectation of decrypting X EncryptedData blocks in a Y size document in Z time, I think that would be very useful -- and help avoid the XPath issue we encountered in xmldsig. -- Joseph Reagle Jr. http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/ W3C Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair http://www.w3.org/Signature/ W3C XML Encryption Chair http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/
Received on Monday, 11 March 2002 17:40:33 UTC