- From: merlin <merlin@baltimore.ie>
- Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2002 19:30:36 +0100
- To: "Takeshi Imamura" <IMAMU@jp.ibm.com>
- Cc: xml-encryption@w3.org
Hi Takeshi, Before you change the current spec, could you first clarify what, if any, changes you would make to the text that I have proposed. I would like to know what direction you are heading in before I cause you any effort. If our paths don't converge, there's no point to your compromising your current spec; instead I think we'll just have to proceed with two separate specs. Merlin r/IMAMU@jp.ibm.com/2002.06.18/00:32:40 > >Hi Merlin, > >Thank you for the detailed text and I'm sorry for not reviewing it sooner. >I just did so and thought it looked pretty good. I have a little concern, >especially I'm still unsure whether we should divide the processing in two >modes, but I will try to incorporate it in the current text. It would take >a few days, hopefully. > >Thanks, >Takeshi IMAMURA >Tokyo Research Laboratory >IBM Research >imamu@jp.ibm.com > > > > > > merlin > > <merlin@baltimore To: Takeshi Imamura/Japan >/IBM@IBMJP > .ie> cc: xml-encryption@w3.org > > Sent by: Subject: Re: Decryption Transf >orm processing question > merlin@baltimore. > > ie > > > > > > 2002/06/13 07:09 > > Please respond to > > merlin > > > > > > > > > >Hi Takeshi, > >r/IMAMU@jp.ibm.com/2002.06.13/00:44:20 >>Anyway, more explicit text would be helpful. I will try to make some text >>on my proposal, too. > >Here is a quick bash at a more formal specification of what I >propose, taking into account what I believe you have suggested. > >Merlin
Received on Monday, 17 June 2002 14:31:08 UTC