Re: Decryption Transform processing question

r/reagle@w3.org/2002.06.17/12:51:25
>> My clarification that my solution is broken is itself
>> broken. The solution works fine because we specify that
>> regular c14n is done by this transform at the end,
>> prior to reparsing.
>
>I'm a little lost here. So you are saying the treatment of xml:foo 
>attributes as you did in [1] *is* necessary. And its presense as part of 
>the decrypt-transform will behave regardless of whether the signature used 
>exc-c14n or c14n?

Right; the c14n that causes this problem is not the signature c14n,
but the c14n which is performed internally by this transform, which
is fixed as regular c14n. Subsequent c14n steps performed by the
signature won't encounter this problem.

Merlin

Received on Monday, 17 June 2002 14:10:52 UTC