- From: Christian Geuer-Pollmann <geuer-pollmann@nue.et-inf.uni-siegen.de>
- Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 20:40:33 +0100
- To: reagle@w3.org, hirsch@zolera.com, xml-encryption@w3.org
--On Freitag, 11. Januar 2002 10:15 -0500 Joseph Reagle <reagle@w3.org> wrote: > Frederick, > > I too have a sense that the text isn't quite right, but I was hoping > folks would check me on it in this thread: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-encryption/2002Jan/0023.html > > See Christian's original email: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-encryption/2002Jan/0017.html Maybe this helps: PIs and Comments do not have an impact on well-formedness. So the only thing which can cause problems of the EncryptedData becomes a new document element is that it contains multiple elements of non-whitespace text nodes: Change Note: If the Type is "content" the plaintext resulting from decryption may not be well formed if the EncryptedData element was (a) the root element of a document, or (b) has other siblings (e.g. PIs and text nodes).) To (please make this more fluid - sorry for my english ;-) Note: If the Type is "content", the plaintext resulting from decryption may not be well formed. This happens if the element whose contents have been encrypted was (a) an element containing more than one child element, or (b) containing non-whitespace text nodes.
Received on Friday, 11 January 2002 14:40:12 UTC