- From: Joseph Reagle <reagle@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 17:19:47 -0500
- To: xml-encryption@w3.org
I believe the final resting home for Requirements now is a Note. So I've done a few tweaks to the req document to get it ready: http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/Drafts/xml-encryption-req $Revision: 1.17 $ on $Date: 2002/02/27 22:13:20 $ GMT by $Author: reagle $ - Updated some of the references. - Tweaked the box which said we want feedback on attribute encryption and say it was discussed but there was no push back during last call. - Removed the other discussion boxes. - Removed the instance validity text about detached encryption and CDATA sections and added the option of application metadata (headers) that can be used to indicate to the app how to restore the document. - In the requirement not to invent a transform processing model, I added a link to recent discussion (with the compression as the example). -- Joseph Reagle Jr. http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/ W3C Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair http://www.w3.org/Signature/ W3C XML Encryption Chair http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/
Received on Wednesday, 27 February 2002 17:19:47 UTC